Richmond Bridge - Game Results

15 June 2013

Summary

PairMatch
Points
Players
1 3.0 Ellis/Philip
2 4.0 Janet/Richard
3 4.0 Chad/Laura
4 1.0 David/Deborah

Scores

 Pairs
Board 1 2 3 4
1 -430 430-120 120
2 -140 140-130 130
3 440-440 190-190
4 -150 150 140-140
5 -420-450 450 420
6 200 460-460-200
7 660 600-600-660
8 -450 420-420 450
9 -150 110 150-110
10 170 -90-170 90
11 -550 170 550-170
12 -200-120 200 120

Matchpoints

 Pairs
Board 1 2 3 4
1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
2 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
9 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
10 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
12 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Total:3.0 4.0 4.0 1.0

Board 1


Dealer: N, Vuln: None
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W N-SE-W
3NT W 4 430 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 2:Richard/Janet
1NT W 2 120 0.00.03:Chad/Laura vs 4:David/Deborah

Board 2


Dealer: E, Vuln: N-S
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3W 3 140 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 2:Richard/Janet
3♣ E 4 130 0.00.03:Chad/Laura vs 4:David/Deborah

Board 3


Dealer: S, Vuln: E-W
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
5♣S 7 440 1.00.01:Ellis/Philip vs 2:Richard/Janet
4♣S 7 190 0.00.03:Chad/Laura vs 4:David/Deborah

Board 4


Dealer: W, Vuln: Both
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
2NT W 3 150 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 2:Richard/Janet
3S 3 140 0.00.03:Chad/Laura vs 4:David/Deborah

Board 5


Dealer: N, Vuln: N-S
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
4E 4 420 0.00.01:Ellis/Philip vs 4:David/Deborah
4E 5 450 0.01.02:Richard/Janet vs 3:Chad/Laura

Board 6


Dealer: E, Vuln: E-W
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3N 5 200 0.00.01:Ellis/Philip vs 4:David/Deborah
3NT N 5 460 1.00.02:Richard/Janet vs 3:Chad/Laura

Board 7


Dealer: S, Vuln: Both
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3NT S 5 660 1.00.01:Ellis/Philip vs 4:David/Deborah
3NT N 3 600 0.00.02:Richard/Janet vs 3:Chad/Laura

Board 8


Dealer: W, Vuln: None
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
4W 5 450 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 4:David/Deborah
4♠ N 4 420 0.00.02:Richard/Janet vs 3:Chad/Laura

Board 9


Dealer: N, Vuln: E-W
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3W 5 150 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 3:Chad/Laura
2W 3 110 0.00.04:David/Deborah vs 2:Richard/Janet

Board 10


Dealer: E, Vuln: Both
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3N 4 170 1.00.01:Ellis/Philip vs 3:Chad/Laura
1NT S 1 90 0.00.04:David/Deborah vs 2:Richard/Janet

Board 11


Dealer: S, Vuln: None
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
3NTx W 3 550 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 3:Chad/Laura
2W 4 170 0.00.04:David/Deborah vs 2:Richard/Janet

Board 12


Dealer: W, Vuln: N-S
ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
 N-S E-W  N-S E-W
2NT N -2 200 0.01.01:Ellis/Philip vs 3:Chad/Laura
1NT N 4 120 0.00.04:David/Deborah vs 2:Richard/Janet

Average HCP

The small number of boards and the "arrow switches" required by Howell Movement
increase the probability of imbalances.

 Pairs
Board 1 2 3 4
1 14 26 14 26
2 17 23 17 23
3 26 14 26 14
4 19 21 19 21
5 15 15 25 25
6 27 27 13 13
7 29 29 11 11
8 21 21 19 19
9 18 22 22 18
10 26 14 14 26
11 17 23 23 17
12 23 17 17 23
Avg. 21.021.018.319.7